LetsDisagreeScientific institutions are influenced by funding incentives.
supportEvidence 0•Votes 2
Heat index0%
Your stanceSet your stance
Community sentiment80% · Agree leaning
DisagreeAgree
Photo by Thomas Wolter on Unsplash
Debate focus
Science and Public Trust
No description provided.
Activity
30-day signal flow
New debates, contributions, and reactions tied to this topic.
Activity score
30/100
5 total signals
Nov 18Dec 17
Positions
5
Contributions
0
Reactions
0
Positions active
5
Contributions
0
Last 30d snapshot
Positions
Arguments on the table
LetsDisagree
LetsDisagreeScientific consensus can be wrong often enough to warrant skepticism.
supportEvidence 0•Votes 2
Heat index0%
Your stanceSet your stance
Community sentiment65% · Agree leaning
DisagreeAgree
Photo by Brett Jordan on Unsplash
LetsDisagreesupport
Heat index0%
Your stanceSet your stance
Community sentiment55% · Split sentiment
DisagreeAgree
LetsDisagreePreprint culture improves science more than it harms it.
supportEvidence 0•Votes 1
Heat index0%
Your stanceSet your stance
Community sentiment50% · Split sentiment
DisagreeAgree
Photo by Fachtu Robbi Almalik on Unsplash
LetsDisagreeScience reporting oversimplifies uncertainty and misleads the public.
supportEvidence 0•Votes 2
Heat index0%
Your stanceSet your stance
Community sentiment35% · Disagree leaning
DisagreeAgree
Photo by piotr sawejko on Unsplash
Community feed
Recent contributions
No contributions yet. Be the first to break the stalemate with a cited argument.
Positions
Argument map
Launched 4d ago
Scientific institutions are influenced by funding incentives.
Launched 4d ago
Scientific consensus can be wrong often enough to warrant skepticism.
Launched 4d ago
Public trust in science is declining primarily due to poor communication.
Community feed
Live contributions
No contributions yet. Be the first to weigh in.